#p100 [which W-Lockhart inserted in the Draft Ord
don't know why-
dec
last wordt.
of his memo. attached to 2.
22417109]
? Leave the penalty as it stands, which
sufficient.
seems to me
/
? Sanction the Ordinance making the remarks suggested above & on 18604.
Me
Ay & the Regulations, the
(I) has.3
eins/;. 2. not as in Straits Raz
re as follows: viz.
the words "And an
in (C) and this whole of (f)
"
Iden
are her
I need not be objected to ? (II) hrs. 6(2) the underlined word,
are new, but so far
•Carried
"
a^R
The words
quite right.
But the last proviso giving the
Registrar General power to refuse, Cavell or suspend registration seems to me ultra vires.
If such a power
is to exist, surely
it ought to be given by the Ordinance
1859 pars than
Shav
(as was done by the Ord. 19 / 1887 5.27/3)) "see annexe. The Protective at the Straits regrets Report for the absence of this provision from the Straits Law the Evidently does not contemplate the possibilit of reintroducing the power by
beaut
Regulation. Notwithstanding what is said in pars. 3,6,7 of this Straits Report of the It aits Protector, I do not think such an unqualifie
36 3
power can be given to Mm Reg. 128 General, since it simply has the effect of turning the whole system of registration into a licensing system, this buispoon such as Existed before, twhich in par. 8 H. 1.242-1850 of desp. of 3 Jan. Cast we
to be mohained.
7.319
said wa
not
The danger feared by then
of Chinese appears to me
distinctly
to be sufficienty
The Right will be bothblay mat by writer of this
lece knoon with ods
39 (C)
Fame from unit 1.25 of 2. 35101167-63a 30 this Httery Order [1.14 of the Straitions] objection to shingut while in cases of suspicion befuchand hm of closing dinding the Reg. General has the further Lowers of requiring security under I do embe ss. 14&15 of this Ord. [1. S of the Straition) ] ? So inform fr. directing that this proviss in the 8th Regube
M.5712
omitted.
I Jam also disposed to think
the provision of
that Reguy should (if it exists at all) be in the Orditself. "manth But I think it should be omitted, angular fention of times having the Effect of licensing fe - Sorry head scrunch
37 (11545/ Steering
A
shablishments a
unes the rest of the certain pergans (1.5. those who
can furnish securities) to keep Wothel. The provisim Leems
se unnecessary for
won how this, it inly worked as Ra Amet it will not primus & licensing
88.5/12 K
any
ther object,
A
the Ordiname
provides penalties for breaking
من
#p100 [which W-Lockhart inserted in the Draft Ord
don't know why-
dec
last wordt.
of his memo. attached to 2.
22417109]
? Leave the penalty as it stands, which
sufficient.
seems to me
/
? Sanction the Ordinance making the remarks suggested above & on 18604.
Me
Ay & the Regulations, the
(I) has.3
eins/;. 2. not as in Straits Raz
re as follows: viz.
گو
the words "Andan
in (C) and this whole of (f)
"
Iden
are her
I need not be objected to ? (II) hrs. 6(2) the underlined word,
are new, but so far
•Carried
===
"
a^R
The words
quite right.
But the last proviso giving the
Registrar General power to refuse, Cavell or suspend registration seems to me altra vires.
If such a power
is to exist, surely.
it ought to be given by the Ordinanced
1859 pars than
Shav
(as was done by the Ord. 19 / 18875.27/3)) "see annexe. The Protective at the Straits regrets Report for the absence of this provision from the Straits Law the Evidently does not contemplate the possibilit of reintroducing the power by
beaut
Regulation. Notwithstanding what is said in pars. 36,7 of this Straits Report of the It aits Protector, I do not think such an unqualifie
36 3
power can be given to Mm Reg. 128 General, since it simply has ther effect of turning the whole systein of registration into a licensing system, this buispoon such as Existed before, twhich in par. 8 H. 1.242-1850 of desp. of 3 Jan. Cast we
to be mohained.
7.319
said wa
not
The danger feared by then
of Chinese appears to me
distinctly
to be sufficienty
The Right will be bothblay mat by writer of this
lece knoon with ods
39 (C)
Fame from unit 1.25 of 2. 35101167-63a 30 this Httery Order [1.14 of the Straitions] objection to shingut while in cases of suspicion befuchand hm of closing dinding the Reg. General has the further Lowers of requiring security under I do embe ss. 14815 of this Ord. [1. S of the Straition) ] ? So inform fr. directing that this proviss in the 8th Regube
M.5712
omitted.
I Jam also disposed to think
the provision of
that Reguy should (if it exists at all) be in the Orditself. "manth But I think it should be omitter, angular fention of times having the Effect of licensing fe - Sorry head scrunch
37 (11545/ Steering
A
shablishments a
unes the rest of the certain pergans (1.5. those who
can furnish securities) to keep Wothel. The provisim Leems
se unnecessary for
won how this, it inly worked as Ra Amet it will not primus & licensing
88.5/12 K
any
ther object,
A
the Ordiname
provides penalties for breaking
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.